When Old Success Stories Don’t Fit the Present

 Recently, a blog post by a famous Japanese actor in his 80s sparked controversy. With great confidence, he wrote:

“Out there are countless jobs that bring joy to others and money to you! Earning 500,000 yen a month is easy. Air conditioners, electrical work, cleaning, home repairs, carpentry—there’s no end to what you can do, even in old age!”

Advice meant for sunrise rarely helps those standing at sunset.

Now, 500,000 yen (about USD 3,400) may not sound like a fortune to Americans. But in Japan, the median monthly income is roughly 280,000 yen (about USD 1,870). Against that backdrop, the claim that “making 500,000 yen is easy” comes across as tone-deaf.

Yes, cleaning is something one could start today. But electrical repairs require a national license as an electrician. Air-conditioner maintenance involves refrigerant gases and circuitry, demanding both expertise and certification. Carpentry, meanwhile, takes years of training before one can provide paid services at a professional level. It is simply not the kind of world where you can declare, “Alright, I’ll be a carpenter starting today and earn 500,000 yen a month.”

This reflects a common pitfall: universalizing one’s youth as if times had never changed. In his younger days, Japan was in the midst of rapid economic growth. The harder you worked, the faster your pay rose. Effort was reliably rewarded. It was the very embodiment of what Adam Smith once wrote in The Wealth of Nations:

“The progressive state is, in reality, the cheerful and the hearty state to all the different orders of the society.”

But modern Japan tells a different story. The growth plateau has long passed. After decades of a dull stationary state, the country is now slipping into a declining state, shaped by demographic collapse and widening inequality. For today’s youth, it is a melancholy era where effort does not necessarily translate into reward.

In such a climate, lecturing the young with outdated values misses the point entirely. Ambition and initiative are certainly admirable, but the returns on effort are never fixed, they are always shaped by the social context. The struggles of today’s youth are not simply a matter of personal effort—they are, in many ways, the outcome of the times.

And this is precisely why success stories can be so unhelpful. They highlight effort while leaving out the timing and luck that played a decisive role. A tale of triumph, polished into a simple “hard work pays off” narrative, can mislead more than it teaches. Stories of failure, by contrast, often reveal the hidden obstacles and blind spots, and thus provide lessons far more valuable than any glittering success.


Living in "Ruitomo" Bubbles

 In Japanese, there’s a saying 類は友を呼ぶ (rui wa tomo wo yobu) literally, “like attracts like.” It’s often shortened to ruitomo. English has a similar expression: Birds of a feather flock together.

Last month, a self-proclaimed loner YouTuber with a massive following made headlines for having an affair with a married man. A month later, she resurfaced on YouTube, and it was picked up by Yahoo News.

According to the report, she said, “Everyone I meet is fooling around. Everyone’s cheating.” Reading that, I couldn’t help but think: yep, ruitomo really is a thing. In my own circle, I don’t know a single person engaged in such behavior. About ten years ago, I did know someone who was having an affair, but our values clashed, so I chose to distance myself.

It made me wonder: perhaps we humans live inside smaller bubbles than we realize.

Gamers may recall the controversy around the game Stellar Blade, where the female protagonist’s physique was slammed by certain journalists as “unrealistic.” One article even claimed: “Eve from Stellar Blade is just bland. A doll sexualized by someone who has never seen a woman.”

To me, it’s clear the writer has barely encountered Asian women.

I myself am baby-faced, slender, and tall (5’7”). Whenever I’m out, I notice women with figures similar to mine—or even taller. So from my perspective, I cannot understand why anyone would call Eve’s physique “unrealistic.”

The truth is, people unconsciously build their own ruitomo bubbles. Anything outside feels alien, sometimes even threatening. And when they project the norms of their tiny bubble onto the entire world, that’s when we hear statements like “Everyone’s cheating” or “a doll sexualized by someone who has never seen a woman.”

On social media, echo chambers are often criticized. But at the root, all human societies are simply clusters of echo chambers. We gather with those who share similar opinions or lifestyles, and that gives us comfort and solidarity. Yet when it goes too far, these echo chambers harden into bubbles that reject the outside world.

Which is why we must acknowledge that echo chambers are the default state of human society. The key is to ask ourselves, “Which bubble am I in right now?” and to cultivate the flexibility to occasionally look outside.

That said, adopting the worldview of “Everyone’s cheating” is one bubble no one needs to step into.


Too Hot to Handle

 In summer, my electricity bill skyrockets because I keep the air conditioner running around the clock.

 ↑ That’s my household’s bill.

The August payment came to ¥23,255 (about USD 160). That covers the electricity I used from mid-June to mid-July, withdrawn automatically on August 1. The previous bill, for mid-May through mid-June, was only ¥11,877. In other words, as soon as the heat sets in, the cost instantly doubles.

Some people might think, “What a waste, running the AC all day and night!” But Japan’s summer heat is extreme. It’s not just the high temperatures, the humidity is relentless. The climate is very much like Florida—sweltering, sticky, and unforgiving.

Without air conditioning, the heat can be life-threatening. Sweat pours out but never evaporates in the damp air. Shirts stay soaked and soon take on the sour smell of a damp rag. It’s unbearable. The last thing I want is to collapse from heatstroke while wrapped in bacteria-ridden fabric.

If someone were planning a trip to Japan and asked for my advice, I’d probably say to avoid midsummer (mid-June to mid-September). At least in my view, it’s simply far too hot and humid to enjoy.

My favorite time of year is from October through February. October is autumn festival season, November brings breathtaking red and gold autumn leaves, December glitters with city lights and holiday illuminations, and January welcomes the New Year. As for February—well, I can’t explain it, but I’ve always been fond of it.


Apologies at the Grave, The Tragic Lessons of the Okawara Kakoki Wrongful Prosecution

 It must have been about five years ago when an American friend of my husband asked me, “I heard that once someone is indicted in Japan, there’s a 99% chance they’ll be convicted. Doesn’t that mean the judiciary isn’t functioning properly?”

At the time, I replied, “It is a problem, yes, but Japan’s police and prosecutors are highly skilled. They only bring cases to court when they have solid evidence and a near certainty of conviction.” Still, I remember feeling uneasy with my own answer.

Why did that memory resurface now? Because this morning’s news covered the Okawara Kakoki wrongful prosecution case.

As the summer sky burns into shades of gold and violet, one cannot help but reflect on the shadows that linger within Japan’s justice system. Japan’s 99% conviction rate hides a darker truth: once indicted, trials become little more than a formality. The Okawara Kakoki case lays bare how prosecutors and courts both failed, culminating in an apology delivered not to the living, but at the grave of a man who died in detention without ever being granted bail.

On August 25, 2025, in a cemetery in Yokohama, senior officials from the Metropolitan Police Department, the Supreme Public Prosecutors Office, and the Tokyo District Prosecutors Office bowed their heads before the grave of Mr. Shizuo Aishima, a former company advisor. He was indicted as a defendant in the case, discovered to have cancer while in detention, and died without ever being granted bail. His family was present at the graveside apology. There were no excuses offered, no self-justification. Earlier this month, on August 7, the authorities had already released a report acknowledging that the arrests, indictments, and detention requests had been unlawful. It was only on that condition that the family agreed to accept their apology.

A formal apology at the company headquarters, followed now by this bow at the grave. Yet the man beneath the gravestone will never speak again. What we must reflect upon is not the gesture itself, but the chain of decisions that brought us here, and who might have stopped them.

The case began with a technical dispute: whether the company’s spray-drying equipment should be classified under Japan’s Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act. Investigators labeled it “equipment capable of internal sterilization,” placing it within strict export controls. The company, however, consistently argued that the model lacked sterilization capacity altogether, and experimental tests supported their claim. What was needed at that stage was a sober technical review and a fair evaluation of the evidence. Instead, momentum carried the process forward, arrests, indictment, and a further indictment. From the moment the courtroom doors opened, the defendants were swallowed by months of detention so long that they began to lose track of time itself.

The harshest element was the way pretrial detention was treated as virtually routine. Even as Mr. Aishima’s condition deteriorated, his requests for bail were repeatedly denied. “Presumption of innocence” may exist in theory, but in practice the vague notion of “risk of flight or destruction of evidence” almost automatically extended confinement. As I mentioned earlier, Japan is known for its 99% conviction rate after indictment. It is often explained by saying, “Prosecutors only bring cases they’re sure to win.” But the darker truth is that once someone is indicted, trial becomes a mere formality. Prolonged detention weakens the defense and functions as punishment before any verdict is rendered. People lose their health, their livelihoods, and their dignity long before they are judged guilty or not.

In this case, prosecutors have been criticized for abusing their broad discretion to indict, while neglecting to rigorously verify the legal requirements under the Act. But responsibility does not end with the prosecution. The continuation of detention and the rejection of bail lie squarely within the authority of the courts. Had judicial independence truly functioned, the need for confinement should have been reconsidered once serious doubts about the technical evidence emerged. Instead, judges largely rubber-stamped the prosecution’s position. This is what critics mean when they speak of Japan’s “hostage justice.” A culture of confession-centered investigations, the treatment of bail as a privilege rather than a right, and the perfunctory reasoning used to deny it—all these converged to decide the fate of one man’s life. The final outcome was a bow before his grave.

The official review has admitted to multiple institutional failings: lack of information sharing, breakdowns in the chain of command, and inadequate technical evaluation. But listing errors is not enough. Prevention depends not on abstract apologies, but on concrete safeguards built into the system itself. Independent experts must be included in pre-indictment technical reviews. Detention must be the exception, not the rule, with courts required to provide detailed, fact-based explanations for bail decisions. All experimental methods and data must be fully disclosed, not filtered through the prosecutor’s interpretation. Accountability must be personalized: those responsible for unlawful actions must be identified and subject to transparent disciplinary procedures. And the definitions and testing standards under the Foreign Exchange Act must be clarified in line with international norms to eliminate arbitrariness.

That bow at the grave should not merely look backward, it must also signify a promise for the future. If misapplied legal standards, procedural shortcuts, and the abdication of judicial oversight remain uncorrected, then tragedies like this will inevitably be repeated. The family’s earlier refusal to accept an apology without truth was, I believe, a visceral rejection of empty words. Only by fulfilling accountability, reforming the system, and leaving a public record of the lessons learned can we hope to ensure that Japan never again has to witness such belated rituals of contrition—apologies spoken only to the dead.

The Many Faces of Festivals

 As of August 7, 2025—立秋 Risshu, the traditional start of autumn—the calendar says fall, yet Japan is still sweltering through day after day above 35 °C (95 °F). On August 5, the city of Isesaki in Gunma set a new national record at 41.8 °C (107 °F). Summer is in full blaze. And yet September is just ahead. From September through November, autumn festivals take place across the country. The culture surrounding Japan’s autumn festivals is distinctive and, frankly, not always easy to grasp—even for me as a Japanese person. To deepen that understanding, I’m presenting an English rendering of “祭のさまざま The Many Faces of Festivals” (1946) by the eminent folklorist 柳田國男 Kunio Yanagita.

My hometown's danjiri

The Many Faces of Festivals

I. What “Festival” Means in Town and in Village

Anyone raised in a village remembers the delight of festivals as a child. Unlike New Year’s or the Bon season, though, once you leave home you rarely chance upon other people’s local festivals, so you don’t end up talking about them much. Cities have shrine festivals too, of course, but far fewer people actually see them up close. As a result, many assume a festival must be something big, flashy, and crowded. That, in a nutshell, is the great divide between town and village.

By a twist of circumstance, many of you are now spending time in a quiet rural place, watching a whole run of festivals—large and small—unfold from spring into summer. Once you really get to know these, you begin to notice things townsfolk often miss.

Village festivals range from grand to humble; in some places there are dozens in a single year. Comparing them changes how you see festivals altogether. Travel around Japan and you discover something else: beneath the surface, festivals share a common core.

I remember the festivals of my home village from fifty, no—nearly sixty—years ago. Since then, I never managed to be back on the very day of the festival and assumed customs must have changed, or differed widely elsewhere. Yet when I actually asked around, I was surprised how many villages still celebrate in ways that look remarkably like my childhood. That, I think, is one of the quiet blessings of this great country.

It’s hard to feel this from hearsay alone. So let me sketch my own memories, and you can compare them with what you see and hear now—what matches, what doesn’t. My birthplace is far from here and little known; imitation is unlikely simply because of distance.

II. Two Shrines, Two Roles

My village had two shrines that hosted festivals. One was the 鎮守 chinju—the “guardian” shrine—located in the next hamlet. Eight or nine districts joined there once a year, holding a single, largest festival in late autumn, near the end of the harvest. The other was the 氏神 ujigami, often called 明神 Myojin, and all the remaining festivals in the year belonged to this local shrine. In rank, the guardian shrine was a district shrine 郷社 gosha, the village shrine a 村社 sonsha with a smaller precinct. Still, when we simply said “the shrine” or “the god,” we meant our ujigami.

Elsewhere the two roles are often combined in one shrine. In the neighboring hamlet, because the guardian shrine stands within its district, there is no separate ujigami; all yearly observances are held at that gosha. Such hamlets are called Miyamoto in parts of central Japan. In some larger villages, one and the same shrine is called both chinju and ujigami. In other places, households of the same lineage keep a private “clan deity” while the whole hamlet jointly worships an 産土 ubusuna (tutelary of the birthplace). Names vary, but you can assume each district has at least one shrine where everyone gathers to celebrate. Those “districts,” after all, are the remnants of older, single villages. Some districts now have two or more shrines—usually because small hamlets merged.

Why did people pool efforts for the guardian shrine? Likely to make the “great festival” truly great—grander and brighter. The festival day often fell around the Ninth Month by the old lunar calendar (mid-autumn). For farmers, autumn is the season of ease. Barring a bad year, preparations start early: households cure mackerel for pressed sushi, the scent of sweet sake drifts through lanes, children eat themselves happily full, and tall banners snap in the autumn wind. On the day, each hamlet sends out its float; some smaller villages pull だんじり danjiri carts. When the 神輿 mikoshi—the portable shrine—sets out to tour the settlements, even the elderly step outside; little ones will follow the drums the whole day.

III. The Great Day and the Rest

On the great festival day, the entire village—every household—was at festival. Daughters married out and sons in service came home; kin were invited; tipsy uncles wandered in and out. The “host house” that managed the festival was busiest: those on duty accompanied the mikoshi and ran errands to the guardian shrine. Women often stayed back for household work, so fewer of them made the rounds. Meanwhile, elders with no assigned role would still visit the ujigami as usual, offering lights and food. Children, captivated by the floats, rarely came by, so the village shrine felt a touch quiet.

There was a clear difference between the guardian shrine’s once-a-year great festival and the other observances at the ujigami. Even where one shrine served both roles, only the great festival featured the divine procession 御幸 miyuki: the splendid tour of the mikoshi, decked in gold and vivid colors. In some big Tokyo shrines the procession loops back to the main hall, but more commonly the mikoshi is welcomed at an 御旅所 otabisho—a temporary “travel lodge” for the deity—where it rests for a day or a night and rites are held. The otabisho site is fixed, often 500–1,100 meters from the main shrine, sometimes farther. Some places, like Miwa in Yamato, set a temporary hall right inside the grounds; our guardian shrine did the same.

In Kyushu, people still call the procession the deity’s “descent” 御降り/御下り okudari. In older thinking, the god came down from a higher realm each time a festival was held. Later, people came to feel the deity abides continually in the shrine building, and festival forms diverged into “great” and “small.” Even then, when rites were held within the main hall, the core idea remained: the deity descends and is present.

Divine descent is not seen with the eye; some festivals even have the god arrive in the deep of night. Turning that into a daytime pageant through sunlit streets is a later development. To suit it, people invented “moving stages” to enliven the route.

IV. Music, Dance, and Pageantry

Music and dance have accompanied festivals since antiquity. For them, people might lay out mats and hang curtains, build a permanent stage beside the hall, or purify a parishioner’s house for temporary use. The place depends on where the deity is formally welcomed that day. Mounting the stage on poles to be borne, or on wheels to be drawn, is newer—meant to brighten the daytime procession—and so is having parishioners perform on it. In that sense, the older form is the small, stationary rite where the community quietly welcomes the deity.

In Kyoto they called such brilliant processions 風流 furyu—pageantry. The style was born of Kyoto’s culture and imitated in the provinces, which could rarely match the capital’s polish. Eager to keep up, country folk poured energy into their great festivals, yet they never treated the smaller observances lightly. Those were intimate village affairs—well known to locals but easy for visitors to miss.

The deity’s “vehicle” was once very simple: a single wand with paper streamers 御幣 gohei, or a clean sacred bough. The belief that the god alights upon it is, quite simply, faith—and many still hold it. To feel that the deity has just arrived in the festival yard requires no special sound or signal. What mattered was preparation: the confidence that time-honored procedures—物忌 monoimi (“things-to-avoid,” ritual abstinence)—had been observed without lapse. With that, people could rest assured the deity would come. Later, some borrowed the Buddhist term 精進 shojin (“purification” or “abstinence”), but in festival practice it chiefly meant bodily cleanliness; eating fish or fowl was fine. The key was never to defile the cooking fire.

V. Purity, “Keeping Away,” and Keeping Company with the Gods

Few pantheons cherish purity and shun defilement as strongly as Japan’s. The idea that a “fire can be defiled” may sound foreign, but people avoided not only contact with blood or mourning themselves; even sharing a hearth with someone who had been in contact with such impurity was thought to distance one from the divine. Thus, in the days before a festival, households closed their doors to visitors and kept a strict monoimi. Crowds, however, invite mishaps. So those who had to work the festival withdrew for several days to a separate place to live in restraint. That place was called the 精進屋 shojin-ya or “vigil lodge” 御籠り所 okomori-dokoro. Sometimes a temporary hut was built; sometimes a private home was purified; some shrines maintained an office or steward’s quarters for it. Nowadays many villages use the worship hall itself. As work lives grew busier, the vigil grew shorter, but in many places young men still bring bedding and keep watch from the night before. Elders and women come the morning of the festival; this is called 日籠り higomori (“day-vigil”), a reminder that the vigil was originally overnight.

People bring neat, clean food and sacred sake, offer the first portion to the deity, then partake themselves and exchange dishes with their neighbors. It is a shared meal of gods and people—singularly joyful and unforgettable, not only for us as boys and girls but for the grown-ups too.

All the “small” shrine days were, at heart, such okomori days—when tiered lunch boxes were opened and adults cheerfully traded cups of sake. Especially delightful was late spring: wisteria and azaleas in the hills; green barley, rapeseed, and rosy clover in the fields; skylarks high overhead. Farmers held a “rice-planting vigil” before they started work, and cherished it most. There were also ad-hoc observances: a “rain vigil” (sometimes nicknamed a “little New Year of moisture”) when timely showers came, or an “insect festival” if pests threatened—each much the same in how the vigil was kept.

“Year-vigil” meant spending New Year’s Eve at the shrine, but winter is cold, so today many simply go before dawn. Around the winter solstice there used to be a “Fire-Lighting” rite: a great bonfire in the shrine’s yard, coaxing spring to come a little sooner. As the flames rose, village children arrived, stripped to wrestle in the firelight, and received treats whether they won or lost.

Beyond these were the seasonal 節供 sekku festivals and the 1st and 15th of each month—perhaps not “fixed” shrine days, yet times when hearts reset, people arrived at similar hours, lamps were lit, and offerings set out. In the Kanto region, people also visited on the 28th, calling these observances 御三日 Osanjitsu. More recently, some gather on the 8th to talk about affairs of the country in the worship hall—conversation that, of itself, becomes a prayer.

Private petitions exist too, but even then people do not go it alone. If someone falls gravely ill, the whole household—often with close friends—goes together to pray; the solitary “hundred visits” are not a country habit. When a child is born, there is a rite called “entering the parish”—氏子入り ujiko-iri. As soon as the mother’s confinement is ritually over, the baby is carried to the shrine; the child’s name is spoken clearly before the deity, and sometimes the infant is laid briefly on the mat to cry under divine eyes. It looks like a family-only observance, but the family also steams red rice, offers a portion on camellia leaves to the shrine, and shares the rest with the village children—an instant way to make new friends. Word spreads fast; the worship hall fills with children that day too.

Apart from one’s own home, the shrine hall is a child’s most familiar place. From about the thirtieth day after birth until their “coming-out” to the wider world, children play there whenever they can. Our Myōjin shrine had a massive bayberry tree—three arm-spans around. Nearly sixty years since I left, I’m told children still gather beneath it, plucking the fruit before it’s even fully ripe—just as I did. The bond between village children and the shrine endures, much as it always has.


The Dark Side of Japanese School Sports

 A prestigious high school baseball team recently withdrew from Japan’s national tournament after a violence scandal, a story that has dominated the news. Japanese school sports are often celebrated as symbols of discipline, perseverance, and virtue. Yet behind this noble image lies a darker reality. According to multiple media reports, the violence was far more brutal than what has been officially acknowledged, suggesting that such incidents may have been systemic rather than isolated. This episode has become emblematic of the disturbing sports culture deeply rooted in Japanese society—what is commonly known as 体育会系(taiiku-kai-kei).

Of course, toxic masculinity exists in Western societies as well. Men may be mocked for carrying umbrellas in the rain, or ridiculed with slurs, like “p-word” if they show weakness. But Japan’s sports culture carries a different kind of pathology. Here, even a one- or two-year age difference creates an absolute hierarchy: seniors command, juniors obey, and disobedience is punished with violence or humiliation. This is not simply peer-to-peer macho posturing—it is a system of master and subordinate, closer to military discipline than to athletics.

I was never part of a sports club myself—I preferred to go straight home after class—but as a student I witnessed many disturbing scenes. One day, a group of baseball players appeared at school with freshly shaved heads. Curious, I asked one of them what had happened. His answer: “Reflection.” They had been punished for not shouting loudly enough during practice, supposedly showing a lack of spirit. In other words, their hair had been sacrificed to prove loyalty. To me, it felt bizarre, almost religious—a ritual humiliation disguised as discipline. Performance in sports should be measured by skill, not by the volume of one’s voice or the length of one’s hair.

I also saw seniors lining up juniors on the floor, forcing them to kneel while screaming insults at them. Freshmen were made to run endless errands unrelated to practice, serving the seniors like servants rather than teammates. Seniors spoke slowly and casually, while juniors—denied any real right to speak—were expected to bark rapid replies in loud voices, as if speed and volume alone could prove their obedience. Watching this, I often wondered: how could a difference of just one or two years justify such rigid hierarchy?

Sports are supposed to nurture people, bring teammates together, and create the joy of effort. Yet in Japan, fear and humiliation have often been repackaged as “discipline” and defended as “tradition.” From an outsider’s perspective, this does not look like baseball or soccer practice at all—it looks like a military cosplay. I feel the same way myself. And I believe these harmful traditions must change. The fact that such scandals are now making national headlines may, at last, be a glimmer of hope.

It is worth remembering that until the 1990s, even corporal punishment by teachers was tolerated in Japan. A student who forgot homework could be slapped hard enough to leave ringing in the ears, and such violence was praised as “tough love.” But as public opinion shifted and newspapers and television exposed these practices, they gradually declined. By the 2000s, teacher-on-student violence had almost disappeared from daily life. Perhaps the same fate awaits the abusive senior–junior hierarchies of taiiku-kai-kei.

I only wish that change had come earlier—back when I was a student myself. If it had, I might have grown to love sports.

Order can be dazzling. Still, I’d rather admire it from afar than lose myself in its uniform rows.

A Torii, a Treaty

 A politician who claimed that “nuclear weapons are the cheapest way to ensure national security” has just been elected. In fact, there’s a surprisingly large number of people in Japan who believe we should either arm ourselves with nuclear weapons or at least start debating the possibility. Frankly, I find this deeply troubling. Of course, it’s only natural to worry about national security as international tensions rise, and I don’t think there’s anything wrong with holding open discussions. But at the very least, shouldn’t everyone be equipped with the basic knowledge of the NPT—the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty—that we all learned in civics class?

Japan is a signatory to the NPT. This means we are legally prohibited from possessing nuclear weapons.

Article II
Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to receive the transfer from any transferor whatsoever of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or of control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; not to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices; and not to seek or receive any assistance in the manufacture of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.

Article IX (3)
For the purposes of this Treaty, a nuclear-weapon State is one which has manufactured and exploded a nuclear weapon or other nuclear explosive device prior to 1 January 1967.

In other words, under the NPT, only five countries are permitted to possess nuclear weapons: the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, and China.
If Japan were ever to acquire nuclear weapons, it would have to withdraw from the NPT.

What would happen if Japan were to leave the NPT? We would almost certainly face severe backlash from the international community. There’s even a possibility that Japan could be attacked, just as the U.S. recently struck Iran’s nuclear facilities. And let’s not forget: Japan is a resource-poor country. We can’t even feed ourselves without imports. If those imports were cut off, our economy and society would grind to a halt. It would be a return to the days of the ABCD line that strangled Japan before WWII.

So when someone claims that nuclear weapons are the “cheapest” form of deterrence for Japan, I honestly can’t understand what part of this scenario looks “cheap” to them.

By the way, my elementary school’s class trip destination was Hiroshima. We visited the famous torii gate at Miyajima, bought souvenirs, and toured the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum. The museum was packed with schoolchildren on field trips, as well as ordinary visitors. Every exhibit was so shocking, so harrowing, that it was hard to look at them directly. As I moved through the crowd, letting myself be carried along almost passively, there came a moment when, all of a sudden, there was no one in front of me. On the floor at my feet, someone had vomited. Honestly, if I had really allowed myself to confront the reality shown in those displays, I think I would have been overwhelmed in the very same way.




The Spider Lily: Japan’s Fiery Flower of Autumn

  At this time of year, the vibrant red blossoms of the spider lily, known in Japan as higanbana (彼岸花) , brighten the landscape. You often s...